Monday, 27 January 2014

BlackBerry, iOS see fall in global Q4 share; Android, Windows Phone gain: Kantar

Cellcom
find my iphone
first iphone
samsung s4
iphone 5s
iphone 5s
iphone 5c
iphone 5


Lumia-1320-635.jpg

Kantar Worldpanel, which tracks consumer behaviour and knowledge based on market monitoring, has recently released their fourth quarter 2013 numbers for the market share of various mobile OS platforms in different regions worldwide, compared with same period in 2012.
According to the report, the period from October to December has been a tumultuous one forBlackBerry, which has seen its market share across the globe decline sharply since Q4 2012. Apple'siOS as well has seen a sharp decline in numbers across the regions counted. On the other hand, market share has increased sharply for Google's Android platform and for Microsoft's Windows Phonein most regions.
The report also finds that in the fourth quarter BlackBerry lost heavily all over USA, Latin America and Europe. In the US, the Canadian smartphone maker lost its share and fell from 0.9 percent in Q4 2012 to 0.4 percent in Q4 2013. On the other hand iOS fell from 49.7 percent to 43.9 percent. Android gained from 46.2 percent to 50.6 percent finally crossing the 50 percent mark to lead in the US. Windows Phone on the other hand also saw a rise form 2.4 percent to 4.3 percent.
Latin America, which was a traditional BlackBerry stronghold, also saw the numbers decline for them. They fell heavily from 10. 3 percent in Q4 2012 to reach a share of 2.8 percent in the same period last year. On the other hand, iOS, fell from 4.4 percent to 4.3 percent. The highest gainer again, was Android, which increased from 61.6 percent to 83.5 percent. Windows Phone fell from 6.8 percent to 4.9 percent.
In Europe, (EU5-France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom), the market share for BlackBerry fell from 3.7 percent to 1.5 percent, while iOS fell from 23.7 percent to 18.5 percent. Android rose from 62.9 percent to 68.6 percent. Windows Phone too saw a surge from 5.6 percent to 10.3 percent. For country-specific EU5 numbers, refer to the chart.
Kantar-smartphone-OS-market-share-Q4-2013.png
It was only in China that BlackBerry saw a gain, where they increased from no market share (0.0) in Q4 2012 to 0.1 percent in Q4 2013. Android increased its presence from 73.7 percent to 78.6 percent in China, while iOS fell from 21.2 percent to 19.0 percent - though these numbers should change soon with China Mobile rolling out its iPhone line in January. Windows Phone gained only slightly to go up from 0.9 percent in 2012 to 1.1 percent in 2013.
With the numbers coming in, BlackBerry will have to seriously rethink strategies so that they can bounce back in the market. Apple has also been steadily losing iOS market-share globally, and once again might need to consider a low-cost variant to address the Android invasion. With the Nokia mobile devices portfolio soon to be under Microsoft's wing, the Windows Phone platform may benefit from the association, and the Redmond giant has also been exploring co-marketing strategies with other major manufacturers.

Saturday, 25 January 2014

How To Get An iPhone 5S On Launch Day (No Guarantees) - The Latest

Cellcom
find my iphone
first iphone
samsung s4
iphone 5s
iphone 5s
iphone 5c
iphone 5



Apple Q1 preview: All eyes on iPhone 5C, or '5F' for 'Fail'?

Cellcom
find my iphone
first iphone
samsung s4
iphone 5s
iphone 5s
iphone 5c
iphone 5


5c-hed

As Apple celebrates the 30th anniversary of the Mac, all eyes are on the runt of the smartphone litter, the iPhone 5C. 
The Cupertino, Calif.-based technology company has for the past half-decade enjoyed strong success in the December holiday quarter. Based on the latest round of Wall Street analysts' notes, it's clear that the iPhone remains the star of the show.
With the introduction of a lower-cost device, the iPhone 5C — at the same announcement as the premium iPhone 5S, there was general concern either one could cannibalize the other and affect Apple's overall profits.
And that almost certainly is exactly what happened. Although, the plus side is that it was the iPhone 5C with a lower price point and margins that failed to spark much interest across the globe. But it still leaves Apple with a problem child that needs fixing, or axing.
Wall Street is expecting the technology giant to post a profit of $14.09 billion, or $13.47 per share, on revenue of $57.46 billion for the holiday quarter.
The company's operating margin is expected to be between 36.5 and 37.5 percent, with analysts expecting the figure to fall in the higher end of the scale at 37.3 percent. The expected margin could have been higher had Apple not incentivized newer iPhone, iPad, and Mac sales with free software and upgrades. 
Analysts are nevertheless expecting strong sales across the board due to the festive season, where sales are typically significantly higher.

iPhone 5S to take biggest sales slice

According to average analyst estimates gathered by Fortune, Apple is expected to announce about 55.3 million iPhones sales during the quarter. 
Apple's bread and butter rests on the iPhone's success. The smartphone division still makes up about half the company's total revenue. But analysts remain cautious on the state of affairs from its newer, lower-end smartphone sibling, the iPhone 5C, which reports suggest iPhone 5C production has been pulled back due to weak demand. 
Credit Suisse analysts Kulbinder Garcha et al said in a research note on Thursday that the iPhone 5S could take up as much as 65 percent of all Apple's smartphone sales, leaving about one-third being lower-cost iPhone 5C devices. It falls in line with regional research figures from the U.K. in December suggest the iPhone 5S is outselling the iPhone 5C by at least three-to-one.
Apple historically hasn't broken out sales of its device portfolios, and that isn't expected to change. 
Thanks to the iPhone's further reach into the Chinese market. Thanks to a customer base of more than 760 million in the country, analysts pegged a 15-20 million boost to iPhone sales.
Many (but not all) China Mobile-related builds were at the end of December, and will account for a spike in first quarter sales. Chinese New Year lands a week after the Apple first quarter earnings call, so expect the second quarter to see another significant bump in sales.
Jefferies analyst Peter Misek concurred, adding:
Our recent round of checks indicates the total builds remain unchanged but further mix shift away from the 5C and toward the 5S and 4S. We note that the volatility in the supply chain is particularly high this quarter and depends on which particular [device version] the part is for. We theorize that could be the source of divergent sell-side [first calendar quarter 2013] build plan estimates.
Misek said in the note he believes solid iPhone 5S demand will offset the iPhone 5C's weakness, but in order to shift inventory price cuts are almost inevitable. 

Macs: year-over-year growth expected

Apple is expected to sell about 4.6 million Macs during the quarter, according to Fortune estimates, up by 13 percent year-over-year.
Of course, the holiday sales patch will boost numbers, but the year-over-year increase can be attributable to the decline in first quarter of 2013 sales as a result of the missed iMac deadline. Taking this out of the equation, sales are about flat year-over-year.

iPad in troubled waters?

Meanwhile, just one fiscal quarter after the latest tablet iteration, the iPad Air, was introduced, analysts have concerns about Apple losing ground as the low-end tablet market continues to grow. 
Apple is expected to announce sales of about 24-25 million iPads during the quarter, Fortune reported based on average analyst estimates, up a modest 10 percent year-over-year. In terms of Apple's market share, in spite of the strong sales, average forecasts suggest a drop of a nearly half from the full year of 2012.
Garcha added later:
Within the competitive landscape, we forecast Apple's tablet share at 22 percent in 2014 down from 41 percent in [calendar year] 2012. While we see the tablet market growing to 447 million units by 2017 (nearly twice 2013 estimates) we see most of the incremental growth in the sub $200 [average selling price] segment where Apple is not currently exposed. 

Friday, 24 January 2014

Hands On of the Lenovo S930 Smartphone

Cellcom
the iPhone 5
64gb iphone
iPhone providers
3 iphone
samsung galaxy player 50
find my iphone
first iphone


Apple's Mac still influences, 30 years after debut

Cellcom
the iPhone 5
64gb iphone
iPhone providers
3 iphone
samsung galaxy player 50
find my iphone
first iphone

Mac Turns 30 today.jpg
Look around. Many of the gadgets you see drew inspiration from the original Mac computer.
Computers at the time typically required people to type in commands. Once the Mac came out 30 years ago Friday, people could instead navigate with a graphical user interface. Available options were organized into menus. People clicked icons to run programs and dragged and dropped files to move them.
The Mac introduced real-world metaphors such as using a trash can to delete files. It brought us fonts and other tools once limited to professional printers. Most importantly, it made computing and publishing easy enough for everyday people to learn and use.
Apple sparked a revolution in computing with the Mac. In turn, that sparked a revolution in publishing as people began creating fancy newsletters, brochures and other publications from their desktops.
'[The Mac has had] incredible influence on pretty much everybody's lives all over the world.'
- Brad Myers, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University's Human-Computer Interaction Institute
These concepts are so fundamental today that it's hard to imagine a time when they existed only in research labs -- primarily Xerox's Palo Alto Research Center in California. Apple co-founder Steve Jobs and his team got much of its inspiration from PARC, which they visited while designing the Mac.
The Mac has had "incredible influence on pretty much everybody's lives all over the world since computers are now so ubiquitous." says Brad Myers, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University's Human-Computer Interaction Institute. "Pretty much all consumer electronics are adopting all of the same kinds of interactions."
Apple didn't invent these tools, nor was the Mac the first to use them. Xerox Corp. sold its own mouse-based Star computer, and Apple's Lisa beat the Mac by months. It's impossible to say what would have happened if those machines hadn't flopped with consumers or whether others would have come along if the Mac hadn't.
But the Mac prevailed and thus influenced generations of gadgets that followed.
The Mac owes much of its success to the way Apple engineers adapted those pioneering concepts. For instance, Xerox Corp. used a three-button mouse in its Alto prototype computer. Apple settled on one, allowing people to keep their eyes on the screen without worrying about which button to press.
While Lisa had those improvements first, it cost about $10,000. The Mac was a "low" $2,495 when it came out on Jan. 24, 1984.
Apple insisted on uniformity, so copying and pasting text and deleting files would work the same way from one application to another. That reduced the time it would take to learn a new program.
And Apple put a premium on design. Early Macs showed a happy face when they started up. Icons and windows had rounded corners. Such details made computers appear friendlier and easier to use -- at least subconsciously, Myers says.
One of the first applications enabled by the Mac's interface was desktop publishing.
Early computers generated text the way a typewriter would -- character by character, one line at a time. Users had a limited number of characters, with no variation in appearance. The Mac was one of the first to approach displays like a TV: Text gets incorporated into a graphic that the computer projects on the screen pixel by pixel.
With those tools, would-be publishers could change fonts, adjust typeface sizes and add attributes such as italics. They could also mix images with text. The earliest Macs popularized "what you see is what you get," or WYSIWYG; formatting on the screen largely reflected how the page would look in print. Instead of going to a professional printer, anyone could simply design and print newsletters on a Mac.
Of course, the Mac's success was never guaranteed.
Initially, many people "thought it was a waste of time and a gimmick," says Dag Spicer, senior curator of the Computer History Museum in Silicon Valley.
He says long-time computer users already knew how to perform computing tasks "very efficiently with just two or three keystrokes. It might have been more efficient for them than to use a mouse."
The Mac didn't run software for the company's Apple II computer, so there was little people could do with it until Aldus -- now part of Adobe -- released PageMaker publishing software in 1985. The original Mac had little memory and a small screen, and it lacked a hard drive. Although the Mac's processor was fast for its time, much of that power went to the graphical interface instead of tasks common for research and commerce.
With the Mac came "the dawn of the notion of we can waste computing power to make it easier for people," says Jim Morris, who worked on the Xerox Alto before joining Carnegie Mellon by the time the Mac came out. "The Macintosh was not a business machine."
Tim Bajarin, a Creative Strategies analyst who has followed Apple for more than three decades, says he was baffled, yet intrigued when he saw the Mac's unveiling at an Apple shareholders meeting in 1984.
"This really was a complete departure from the computing that we knew," he says. "None of us had any clue what its potential would be."
In fact, despite its radical interface, sales were lukewarm. For years, it was mostly a niche product for publishers, educators and graphics artists. Corporate users stuck with IBM Corp. and its various clones, especially as Microsoft's Windows operating system grew to look like Mac's software. (There were years of lawsuits, capped by a settlement.)
Now the world's most valuable company, Apple Inc. nearly died in the 1990s as its market share dwindled. After a 12-year exile from Apple, Jobs returned in 1997 to rescue and head the company. A year later, he introduced the iMac, a desktop computer with shapes and colors that departed from beige Windows boxes at the time.
Then came the iPod music player in 2001, the iPhone in 2007 and the iPad tablet in 2010. They weren't Macs, but shared the Mac's knack for ease of use. Elements such as tapping on icons to open apps have roots in the Mac. The popularity of these devices drove many Windows users to buy Macs.
In recent years, PCs have declined as consumers turn to mobile devices. Apple sold 16 million Macs in the fiscal year ending Sept. 28, down 10 percent from a year earlier. By contrast, iPhone sales grew 20 percent to 150 million and iPads by 22 percent to 71 million.
The Mac has aged to the point that it's starting to draw inspiration from iPhones and iPads. Several Mac apps have been refined to look and work more like mobile versions. Macs now have notifications and other features born on mobile devices. Windows computers, meanwhile, now emphasize tablets' touch-base interfaces.
Yet without the Mac, we may never have had the iPhone or the iPad, and phones might do little more than make calls and send email.

Thursday, 23 January 2014

iOS 7 Increase Jailbreak Battery Life 7.0.4 Tips For iPhone 5S,5C 4S iPad

Cellcom
find my iphone
first iphone
samsung s4
iphone 5s
iphone 5s
iphone 5c
iphone 5




Android 4.4 KitKat Problems: Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Third Party Accessories Rendered Non-Functional By Update

Cellcom
the iPhone 5
64gb iphone
iPhone providers
3 iphone
samsung galaxy player 50
find my iphone
first iphone


Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Third Party Accessories Rendered Non-Functional By Android 4.4 KitKat Update

While many are rejoicing that the Android 4.4 KitKat update for the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is officially underway, many early adopters are not quite as ecstatic about the issues that have come with it.
Android 4.4 began updating on the Galaxy Note 3 SM-N9005 model in Poland last week while the Galaxy Note 3 SM-N900 model in Russia began updating earlier this week. Thus far, only these two regions have seen updates for the Galaxy Note 3, but that has not stopped tech-savvy people from discovering a tricky flaw having to do with third-party accessories. Users at the XDA Developers forum report that since the Android 4.4 KitKat update has rolled out Galaxy Note 3 handsets, third-party accessories such as as smart covers are no longer working. The Spigen Slim Armor View smart cover, in particular, has been singled out as an accessory that does not work with the Android 4.4 updated Galaxy Note 3. It appears the origin of this problem is simple and may be deliberate on Samsung’s part.
Korean outlets reported in October that Samsung planned to outfit various accessories as smart covers and wireless chargers with authentication chips, which would make Samsung devices only compatible with Samsung brand accessories. Third-party smart accessories without the chip would fail to function with Samsung devices. The manufacturer never indicated when it would implement such "IC" chips, but it appears that the time is now.
According to reports, Samsung claims it's trying to limit the number of accidents involving unauthorized accessories. Notably, there have been several instances of Samsung devices spontaneously combusting, many of which are blamed on owners using unauthorized third-party batteries with subpar manufacturing. However, consumers have long trusted manufacturers like Spigen to provide alternatives to Samsung accessories. Conversely, many sources note that Samsung could also be attempting to increase profits of its own accessories by making them solely compatible. A monopoly on the Samsung accessory market could drive prices up, but could also urge Samsung to increase the quality of its accessories to increase purchases.